| Lummer's Logic |
|
 |
 |
| Naked Advice
|
|
By Scott Lummer
Chief Investment Officer, mPower |
May 22, 2001
This week I will catch up on some of
my mail, giving short answers to several of the questions you've sent in. What does that
have to do with the title? Well, in Internet land, columns have to attract
"eyeballs" (in other words, readers). Sad to say, a typical article about
investing attracts as many eyeballs as a bath of sulfuric acid. What's a columnist to do?
Simple: Find an idea that works, and
copy it. I've noticed that the hottest news site these days, the one attracting the most
new viewers, is not CNN or even USA Today, but something called nakednews.com. If you
haven't heard of it, this site features male and female anchors delivering the news while
taking their clothes off. The site has garnered a lot of publicity, and no less an
authority than Time magazine called it the best source for global news coverage,
although the correspondent might have been kidding because "coverage" seems an
inappropriate word.
Because I write for a family Web site,
there is no video to accompany this article. All I could get my editor to agree to were
sound effect prompts. So feel free to use your imagination as I provide answers to your
questions while slowly stripping down to my shorts. (Actually, I'll have to do that in my
imagination, too. I am writing this on a plane and the woman next to me, who has been
looking over my shoulder as I type, is beginning to get nervous.)
Stable Value Funds
How do stable value funds fit into
an asset allocation?
(Sound of buttons popping)
Many 401(k) plans include a stable
value fund as one of the investment choices. For investors who do not want to put all of
their 401(k) money in stocks, either because they are conservative investors or because
they are nearing retirement, stable value funds can be an excellent place to put money.
Most stable value funds are invested in relatively short-term (three-year or less)
fixed-income contracts. As I've said before, I think investors should invest the majority
of their money in short-term instruments, maturing in between one and three years. But of
course, it depends on the specific stable value fund. As with any investment, you should
read up on the fund before investing in it.
I Don't Make a Lot of Money
Help me with my 401(k). I don't
have a lot of money and I don't make a lot of money. I am a widow and probably won't
retire for another l0 years. If I put $20 a week away and my boss matches 25 percent of
that, will I be OK?
(Sound of unbuckling)
I entered your numbers (with some
assumptions) in our "401(k)alculator": $25,000 salary, 4 percent contribution,
($1,000 or $20 per week), 1 percent match (25 percent of the contribution), 10 percent
return, 3 percent inflation, current age of 55, and a retirement age of 65.
With those assumptions, in 10 years
you would have $25,000, or $18,000 in today's dollars. (In other words, your $25,000 in 10
years will buy you what $18,000 buys you today.)
Can $18,000 last a lifetime? That is
very unlikely. My only advice is to save as much as you can (see if you can find a few
more dollars to put away each week) and consider working for a longer time.
No Magic in the Tax Code
Is there a formula that could help
me determine how much different my take-home pay would be if I maxed out or made a very
significant contribution to my 401(k)? In other words, how much would it lower my taxable
income? My current gross income is roughly $65,000. Would this put me in a lower tax
bracket, thus possibly letting me take home a very similar pay?
(Sound of unzipping)
There aren't any magic breakpoints in
the tax code. Assuming you are married, you are at a marginal 28 percent rate. For every
dollar you contribute, your take-home pay will be reduced by 72 cents, saving you 28 cents
in taxes (ignoring state taxes). Tax brackets are figured for marginal income, not total
income. When you hit a lower bracket, it means that additional contributions will
save you a lower percentage of taxes. It does not mean that all of your taxes are
recalculated using the lower rate.
19 Year Old Investor
I'm 19 and just finished my first
year of college. I would like to start investing now to save for my retirement. Being in
college, I don't have a lot of money, but I'd like to start putting a little away each
month. What sort of mutual fund would you suggest? I'm not big on risk-taking. Thanks for
your help.
(Sound of clothes rustling)
You are my heroine — 19 and
planning for the future! Even though you are not big on risk-taking, since you are
investing for the very long-term, I would suggest putting it all in stocks. If you can
only choose one fund because of investment minimums, I would choose an all-capitalization
index fund (some companies might call it a Wilshire 5000 index fund or a Russell 3000
index fund). When you have enough money to add a second fund, I suggest that you put about
25 percent of the total into a broad-based international fund.
Aggressive Investing
If you're retiring at 55, doesn't
it make more sense to keep a more aggressive plan (like the 10 years before retirement)
for the 30 or more years of life expectancy I might have?
(Sound of metal clanging. Metal? Oops,
I didn't mean to wear that today.)
An excellent question. I need to do a
better job of explaining why an investor should become more conservative as he or she
approaches retirement.
The assumption most people make is
that they should become more conservative because their time horizon is shorter. But
that's not really the reason. It is because they have less financial flexibility. Speaking
personally, right now I am on target to reach my retirement goals. I plan on working for
20 more years. Over that time my intention is to save a lot more, but also spend some on
luxury items as well. I made a decision a few years ago to leave a better-paying job and
work here because it was what I really wanted to do. If we had a huge, lengthy market
decline, and I were no longer on track to meet my goals, I still have the flexibility to
spend less money, seek a better-paying job, or plan on retiring later, or sell my Chaka
Khan album collection. Fifteen years from now, however, I will have less financial
flexibility because the money will have already been spent, the job opportunities will be
gone and the decision to retire later will be more painful, and the album collection will
have lost its value.
And there you have it — the naked
truth about investing for retirement. Uh oh. The woman next to me is ringing her flight
attendant call button. Sometimes I really do get too involved in my writing.
 Lummer's Logic Archives
The information provided here is intended to help you understand the general issue and
does not constitute any tax, investment or legal advice. Consult your financial, tax or
legal advisor regarding your own unique situation and your company's benefits
representative for rules specific to your plan.
401Kafe.com is the
premier online community resource for 401(k) participants
Copyright ý 1996 - 2000 mPower. All Rights Reserved.
|
