The Experts
|
|

|
March 20, 2001
This Week, Ted Tackles:I want my employer to offer a 401(k) plan, and we have a lot of employees earning over $80,000 a year. How will that affect the plan? ... My employer says it can't make its matching contribution for 2000 until the W-2s have been issued. Is this legal? ... Our company failed and I'm trying to close the 401(k) plan. What do I do with the contributions from employees I can't find? ... What happens if you leave before a safe harbor matching contribution is made?
|
Question: I work for a company that doesn't have a 401(k)
plan. I have been trying to convince my employer to start one, and my employer's
accountant said we couldn't. He says that all employees must sign on or the ones that do
not will limit the amount all others can contribute. As it stands, our company has 13
employees. Six make $80,000 a year or more, and the other seven only make $18,000 or less
and don't want to contribute. The employer won't offer a matching contribution. Are we all
limited by those who don't want to contribute?
TB: This limitation that the
accountant is talking about is what is known as the discrimination test. This was a
provision Congress added to the 401(k) plan to ensure that this benefit is offered equally
to all employees. The contribution limits for the highly paid, or highly compensated
employees (HCE) in IRS lingo, are dependent upon the contributions made by the lower-paid
employees. This creates an incentive for the highly paid employees to encourage the
lower-paid employees to contribute, and as much as they can. While this may seem to be a
self-serving argument for the top-paid folks, the upshot is that the lower-paid employees
get a real benefit.
Given the situation you've described, there is a way that your employer could make this
work.
The compensation limit for HCEs is now $85,000 a year rather than $80,000. If you start a
401(k) plan this year, employees who earned over $85,000 last year will potentially be
included in the HCE group. I say potentially because there is another alternative. When
there are a relatively high number of employees earning over $85,000, the employer may
elect to include only those who are among the 20 percent of the highest paid in the HCE
group. In your situation, this would include only two employees. The others who earn more
than $85,000 may be included in the nonHCE group so long as they aren't 5 percent
owners.
You may be asking at this point, what will all this accomplish? This is the reasoning to
use with your accountant to justify a plan.
Eligible employees who aren't among the top 20 percent (in terms of compensation) may
contribute up to 25 percent of pay subject to the $10,500 individual annual contribution
limit. Contributions for the employees who are in the top 20 percent group will be limited
to the average percentage of pay that the other employees contribute, plus an additional
two percentage points. For example, assume the contribution average for the other eligible
employees is 3 percent. The employees who are in the top 20 percent group may contribute 5
percent. Assume these individuals earn $130,000; they will be able to contribute $6,500,
which is a lot better than the $2,000 they can contribute to an IRA. The fact that half or
more of the eligible employees choose not to contribute only impacts the two employees who
are highly compensated.
It doesn't make sense not to have a plan just because these two employees may not be able
to contribute as much as they would like. Please get back to me if you would like further
assistance.
Question: Last year, my employer elected to contribute 3
percent of salary for all employees to the 401(k) plan so that the company would qualify
for the safe harbor plan provision (no discrimination test). However, they set it up
stating their contribution for the entire year would go in at the end of the year. The
year ended weeks ago and their contribution still has not been put into our 401(k). Each
time I ask when their contribution will be made, I get vague responses that they can't
figure it out until our W-2s for 2000 are issued. Is this way of doing things legal?
TB: The deadline for employer
contributions to the plan is the day the corporate tax return is filed for the applicable
year. Let's assume in your situation that the corporate tax year is the calendar year. The
deadline for filing the tax return is March 15 unless an extension is granted. If it is,
that could push the tax-filing deadline all the way to Sept. 15. This means your employer
will have to make the contribution by March 15, unless a filing extension is obtained, in
which case the employer will have until the extended tax-filing date to make the
contribution.
The W-2s must be issued by Jan. 31. That date is long gone at this point. What your
employer is doing is legally OK, but your employer should tell you when this contribution
will be made.
Question: I was chief operating officer for a company that
failed and had naývely signed up to be trustee for our 401(k) plan, not fully
understanding that my role as trustee would survive our bankruptcy filing.
I have been working to close out the plan by getting all employees to request
distributions or rollovers. I hope to close everything out and file my IRS 5500 Forms for
2000 and 2001 and then be done with this headache. If some of the employees do not
complete their forms, at what point can I just complete the form for them, send them a
distribution check, and give them information about doing a rollover? Also, what if I
can't track down employees because they've moved?
TB: At least you are hanging in there
to do what is needed to get the plan terminated. In many instances, closing a plan when a
company goes out of business is delayed because those involved don't hang around to get
the job done. My recommendations to expedite this process are as follows:
- Send those who have not responded written notice that their
money will be automatically distributed, less the taxes that must be withheld, if they do
not respond. You can force them to take a distribution since you are terminating
the plan.
- To find lost employees, contact the Social Security
Administration to see if they can help. Another possibility is to let all former employees
know which ones you can't locate and/or to place a small ad in a paper in the area where
the employee lived.
- If you are unable to find all participants, I would still
file the Form 5500 (the plan annual report) for 2001 marked as final return. The company
is responsible for filing the Form 5500 not the trustees. Any penalties for filing
deficiencies are also the company's responsibility.
Question: I'm in a safe harbor 401(k) plan where the
employer matches dollar-for-dollar on the first 3 percent of compensation and $0.50 on the
dollar for the next 3 percent. But, the employer doesn't actually fund the match until the
next plan year. Is there anything that precludes the employer from cashing out account
balances under $5,000 before the match is made?
For example, if an employee left the company in 2001 with an account balance of $4,800,
could the employer still cash him out in 2001 even though the employer is obligated to
contribute the 2001 matching contribution of $500 to his account in 2002?
TB: The employer contribution earned
by terminated employees must still be made regardless of when the contribution is made.
Settlement of the accounts for terminated employees will depend upon the terms of the plan
document. Generally, no distributions are made until all contributions have been made.
Technically, the contribution that has not been deposited is an asset of the plan as of
Dec. 31 as an accrued contribution. In my opinion, each employee's vested share of this
contribution should be included when determining whether the benefit payable exceeds the
$5,000 threshold.
Ted Benna, creator of the first 401(k) retirement savings
plan, will answer your most intriguing questions every Tuesday. With over 30 years of
experience as an employee benefits consultant, Ted is a nationally recognized expert on
benefits issues. He has authored two books, Helping Employees Achieve Retirement Income
Security and Escaping the Coming Retirement Crisis, and is President of the
401(k) Association. Ted is a frequent speaker at meetings of 401(k) plan sponsors and
participants. His articles and comments have appeared in numerous publications, including The
New York Times and The Wall Street Journal.
Read Ted Benna's Biography
Ted's Table Archives
The information provided here is intended to help you understand the general issue and
does not constitute any tax, investment or legal advice. Consult your financial, tax or
legal advisor regarding your own unique situation and your company's benefits
representative for rules specific to your plan.
401Kafe.com is the premier online community resource for
401(k) participants
Copyright ý 1996 - 2000 mPower. All Rights Reserved.
|