Question: In a recent column, you
answered a question relative to withdrawals of after-tax money from a 401(k). You stated
that a person is required to also withdraw a portion of the pre-tax money along with the
after-tax money. I seem to recall a rule that states that you can withdraw any after-tax
money that was invested prior to 1985 without being required to withdraw a portion of the
pre-tax money as well. Is this true and if so, could this pre-1985 after-tax money be
withdrawn without penalty or tax implications? I see that my statement has a category
listed as "pre-1985 after-tax."
TB: You're correct that
after-tax contributions made before 1985 are treated differently than after-tax
contributions made after 1985. You're permitted to withdraw the pre-1985 after-tax
contributions without having to withdraw any of the taxable portion of your account. This
is why these contributions are shown separately on your statement. Thanks for the
reminder.
Question: We're considering purchasing
a second home to use for retirement. The total account balance in my two 401(k)s is
approximately $55,000. We'd like to keep our present home, sell it in a couple of years,
and use that money for retirement. Using the 401(k) money now would substantially reduce
our house payments and allow us to be able to afford them after retirement.
If we withdrew that money now, what would we pay in taxes? Does this plan seem reasonable
to you? By the way, why is there a penalty tax (before 59ý) if we've lost money in the
stock market in the 401(k)? That doesn't seem right.
TB: For starters, you probably won't
be able to withdraw the money from your 401(k) for this purpose if these are pre-tax
contributions. Such contributions may be withdrawn prior to age 59ý, while you are still
employed by this company, only for IRS-approved financial hardships. One of the
IRS-permitted reasons is the purchase of a primary residence. This won't be your primary
residence at the time you purchase it; therefore, you shouldn't be permitted to make a
withdrawal. Your other questions will be irrelevant if you can't withdraw the money but I
will answer them anyway.
Any withdrawal prior to age 59ý, while you're still employed by the company that
maintains the 401(k) where your money is invested, is fully taxable, plus a 10 percent
penalty tax will also apply. Probably at least 30 percent of any amount withdrawn would be
lost in taxes. Incurring this tax hit so that the payments on the second home will be
lower doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
I don't recommend buying the second home now if you have to withdraw money from your
401(k) to do so. Real estate can become illiquid, meaning you can't always sell it at the
price you would like when you want. It took me several years to sell our home the last
time the real-estate market tanked. Depleting your retirement savings in order to own two
homes isn't a good idea unless you will have other funds to live on when you retire. I
recommend keeping your money in the 401(k) and delaying purchasing your retirement home
until after you retire and have an offer on your present home.
Concerning your last question, the amount you withdraw from your 401(k) will ultimately be
taxable. The best time to withdraw it is after you retire and have little or no other
taxable income. You have been contributing to your 401(k) for a number of years if you
have accumulated $55,000. In all likelihood, the amount you have accumulated exceeds the
amount you have contributed despite the recent drop in stock prices. However, even if the
value of your account is less than the amount you have contributed, withdrawals are fully
taxed because no tax has ever been paid on any of this money.
Question: I have two 401(k)s from
previous employers. I understand that if I withdrew from my 401(k) at my current employer
I would pay 20 percent in income taxes plus a 10 percent penalty fee. Does the 10 percent
also apply to 401(k)s with previous employers. I am 54 years old.
TB: The same tax rules apply to
withdrawals from you current and prior employers' plans. Because you left the prior
employers before you attained age 55, any amount you withdraw prior to age 59ý will be
fully taxable, as additional income and the 10 percent penalty tax will be imposed. The
only way to avoid the 10 percent penalty tax, if you want to withdraw money now, is by
taking it as an annuity income stream, if the plans permit this type of distribution.
Question: My division is being
outsourced to another company and I'm not certain if the human resources department is
being honest with us about our options. They claim we fall under the "same desk
rule" in which we would have only two options with our 401(k) plan. They are: (1)
Transfer pre-tax contributions and earnings to our new employer's plan, OR (2) Leave the
401(k) funds with the old employer, which will remain there until terminating employment
with the new employer.
Do we really have only these two options with our 401(k) funds? If yes, what's odd is: (1)
Although we all are being fully vested in our 401(k) regardless of years of service,
vesting rules for our cash balance pension remains the same. We aren't all vested. (2) We
don't have the option to transfer our 401(k) into a rollover IRA EXCEPT if
we do a pre-tax transfer to our new employer. Then we would be eligible to receive a
distribution of the remaining 401(k) balance, i.e., company contributions and earnings,
earnings on after-tax contributions, and any previous rollover amounts may be eligible for
a rollover to an IRA or the new company's 401(k) plan (after-tax contributions would be
sent to us as a separate check). Are they allowed to do this to us (allow transfer of
OTHER funds ONLY if pre-tax contributions are transferred to a new employer and not allow
us to move the pre-tax contributions to a rollover IRA)?
TB: I can understand why you are
questioning the information you have been given. It must seem strange that you can
withdraw the company contributions after they are transferred to the new plan but you
can't withdraw your pre-tax contributions. This is correct because the law and IRS
regulations make it more difficult to withdraw your pre-tax contributions than the
employer contributions while you are still employed.
The IRS has recently softened its position on the "same desk rule" in cases
where the assets were sold for cash and comprised less than 85 percent of the selling
company's assets. You should ask your HR department whether this change has been
considered. The two options you have been given with respect to the pre-tax contributions
are correct unless the recent IRS change can be applied to your situation.
Question: My question concerns a
strange thing with my wife's 401(k). We had it invested in one fund, and apparently they
decided to drop that fund from the plan. They switched our money from one fund to another,
supposedly similar, fund without our knowledge. As luck would have it, it has been pounded
particularly hard since she left in March. Can they rightfully do this?
TB: The issue you raise is a very
interesting one. Employees are constantly told that managing the 401(k) money is their
responsibility. They must decide how to invest the money and accept full responsibility
for the results. Then the employer decides to change funds without consulting the
participants. Participants suddenly find their money has been moved to a new fund or funds
without their approval. When this happens, I'm frequently asked, "how can the
employer do this if investing is my responsibility?" The answer is that the employer
can change funds without consulting the participants and they frequently do so for a
variety of reasons. There clearly is an interesting contradiction here, which I have been
speaking about recently at industry conferences.
Question: I'm 55 and considering
retirement very soon. I intend to combine my pension-plan lump sum with my 401(k), leaving
the total in my current 401(k) account. I also intend to find work to supplement my
retirement. Would my work plans threaten the non-penalty status of tapping into a 401(k)
at age 55?
TB: Continuing to work after age 55
won't impact your right to tap into your 401(k) funds without triggering the penalty tax,
as long as you are not working for the company that maintains the 401(k) where your money
is held. You may work for any other company, either part or full time, without impacting
your eligibility to withdraw these funds without penalty. You could even return to work
with the same employer after the distribution has been reported to the IRS.
Ted Benna, creator of the first 401(k) retirement savings
plan, will answer your most intriguing questions every Tuesday. With over 30 years of
experience as an employee benefits consultant, Ted is a nationally recognized expert on
benefits issues. He has authored two books, Helping Employees Achieve Retirement Income
Security and Escaping the Coming Retirement Crisis, and is President of the
401(k) Association. Ted is a frequent speaker at meetings of 401(k) plan sponsors and
participants. His articles and comments have appeared in numerous publications, including The
New York Times and The Wall Street Journal.
Read Ted Benna's Biography
Ted's Table Archives
|