
|
|

|
November 21, 2000
This Week, Ted Tackles: What is it called if my company contributes up to 3.5 percent of my annual earnings at the end of each year? ... If I roll my 401(k) money into an IRA, will it be vulnerable to the IRS? ... Do employers get a percentage or commission fee for the money that is taken out of employees' salaries for their 401(k)?
|
Question: What kind of a contribution is it when my company
contributes up to 3.5 percent of my annual earnings at the end of each year? Is this
considered a company matching contribution? If so, would you consider it a good benefit?
Or, would a company match of $0.50 of each $1.00 I contribute be a better benefit?
TB: A 3.5 percent employer
contribution is better than a $0.50 match because all eligible employees get the 3.5
percent contribution, including those who do not contribute. Typically about 85 percent of
eligible employees contribute when the employer-matching rate is $.50 per $1.00 of
employee contributions. The 15 percent who do not contribute do not receive any benefits.
These employees will receive the 3.5 percent employer contribution to your plan. Your plan
design is better for employees who decide not to contribute to the plan, without
penalizing those who do contribute. Employees who contribute 6 percent of pay with a 50
percent employer match will receive 3 percent of pay, which is less than the 3.5 percent
employer contribution.
There is one potential downside to this design. A lower percentage of nonhighly paid
employees are likely to contribute because they do not have to do so to get the 3.5
percent employer contribution. This will result in smaller retirement nest eggs for these
employees. In addition, the amount that the highly compensated employees may contribute
will be adversely impacted by the reduced level of participation from the lower-paid
employees.
By the way, there are a number of names that are used to describe this type of employer
contribution, including: automatic, discretionary, profit-sharing, basic, fixed, and
pension.
Question: I owe the IRS money and am on a monthly payment
plan with them. However, I am concerned because I have a 401(k) with a company that I left
in August. Can the IRS take the money if they find out about it? Should I roll it over to
an IRA now or I wait until my new company offers the 401(k) option and then roll the money
directly into that plan?
TB: Getting behind on your federal
taxes is a big problem. The IRS is tough but they will work with you if you fulfill your
commitment for paying the back taxes. A former business acquaintance of mine went to
prison because he defaulted on his agreement for paying back taxes, so don't mess with
these guys. I recommend getting the back taxes paid even if you have to use your
retirement savings to do so. The IRS will not go away you still have to pay the
taxes even if you declare bankruptcy.
A 401(k) currently provides somewhat greater protection from creditors than an IRA, so I
would recommend keeping your money in a 401(k) plan rather than an IRA. Your retirement
savings are secure as long as you are making the monthly payments per your agreement with
the IRS.
Protections for IRAs vary from state to state. I suggest you talk with an attorney so you
fully understand your options.
Question: Do employers get a percentage or commission fee
for the money that the employees have taken out of their salary for their 401(k)? Can
employers borrow from employees' 401(k) money?
TB: The cost of administering the
plan may legally be passed on to the participants to pay; however, these expenses must be
reasonable. Normally, these expenses are paid by asset-based fees that reduce the
investment return participants receive. For example, if you have a $10,000 account balance
and your plan uses retail mutual funds, you are probably paying about 1 percent or $100
per year for investment and administrative services. It is legally permissible to charge
an up-front administrative fee that is deducted from contributions before they are
invested in the plan but this is unusual. The administrative fees are paid to the
organization that manages your 401(k) plan not your employer.
Some plans at smaller companies also select investment arrangements in which a commission
is paid to the individual who helps sell and install the plan. This commission is paid to
the sales representative not your employer. Smaller companies with plans that have
less than $10 million in assets usually pay the plan administrative fees. It costs these
companies money to offer their employees a 401(k) even when there aren't any employer
contributions.
Employers with plans that have $10 million or more of assets typically do not pay any
administrative fees when the money is invested into retail mutual funds. Some very large
companies actually receive compensation from the fund companies when money is invested in
retail mutual funds. For example, an employer that has more than $100 million invested in
retail mutual funds may receive 25 percent of the investment management fee from the fund
company to help pay for the cost of running the plan. This practice exists only at very
large companies that use retail mutual funds.
If you are confused at this point, I am not surprised
because there are many fee arrangements, which makes it difficult for participants to know
exactly what is happening. Employers paid all the noninvestment fees in the early days of
401(k) and I strongly believe these plans would be greatly improved by returning to this
model. Separating investment and noninvestment services and fees will make it much easier
for participants to understand the cost of investing and to seek less expensive
alternatives.
Ted Benna, creator of the first 401(k) retirement savings
plan, will answer your most intriguing questions every Tuesday. With over 30 years of
experience as an employee benefits consultant, Ted is a nationally recognized expert on
benefits issues. He has authored two books, Helping Employees Achieve Retirement Income
Security and Escaping the Coming Retirement Crisis, and is President of the
401(k) Association. Ted is a frequent speaker at meetings of 401(k) plan sponsors and
participants. His articles and comments have appeared in numerous publications, including The
New York Times and The Wall Street Journal.
Read Ted Benna's Biography
Ted's Table Archives
The information provided here is intended to help you understand the general issue and
does not constitute any tax, investment or legal advice. Consult your financial, tax or
legal advisor regarding your own unique situation and your company's benefits
representative for rules specific to your plan.
401Kafe.com is the premier online community resource for
401(k) participants
Copyright ý 1996 - 2000 mPower. All Rights Reserved.
|